The argument about the equant in chapter 4
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · Deutsches Museum, München
2026-11-10
“DCE exterior aequet CBE, CEB interiores : ergo parte CEB ablata, residuus CBE vel DBE minor erit quam DCE”
Astronomia nova, Part I, ch. 4 — KGW 3, p. 73
“Totus ergo orbis solidus jam velox jam tardus est. Quod COPERNICVS ut absurdum rejicit.”
One figure, six points, about ten steps: compact enough to show how a reconstruction works.
The model is Ptolemy’s, as Kepler presents it.
DBE < DCE holds in every position, with equality only at the apsides — not only at the right angle Kepler supposes.
The hypothesis BC = BA is stated and needed by no step.
Elements I.32 needs a triangle CBE: at the apsides there is none.
In chapter 2 Kepler states the equivalence of eccentric and concentric with epicycle and leaves the proof to the figure: “Nec verbis opus est.”
Famulus Astra · paper (PDF)
Published by OpenScienceTechnology GmbH · Legal notice · Privacy