Euler’s Argument for the Tide-Raising Force, Reconstructed

One segment of a source, passage by passage, beside its formal reconstruction

Gerd Graßhoff

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · Deutsches Museum, München

2026-11-10

One segment of one source

  • Euler, Inquisitio physica in causam fluxus ac refluxus maris (Eneström 57), chapter II
  • The end of §22 and §§24–29: seven pages, 33–39 of Opera omnia II 31
  • The question: by what force does the sun or the moon tend to move a particle of the earth relative to its centre?

“propria vis, qua quaeque particula agitabitur, innotescet, si a vi acceleratrice illam particulam sollicitante auferatur vis acceleratrix, quam centrum Terrae patitur” (§22)

The page: source beside reconstruction

Source Reconstruction Notes
Euler’s text of the passage, Latin or English the step that says the same thing explicitly: proposition, premises, rule, mark what is supplied, where the route differs, what the check found
  • Twelve passages, nine parts of the argument
  • One action per passage: open its page in the edition, in a separate window
  • A compact figure stays in view and shows what the selected step speaks of

Nothing of the source is typed

  • Latin: from the page of the edition, between a first and a last phrase that must be found exactly once
  • English: the edition’s stored page translation, compared with the Latin; three wordings corrected, all at a page break
  • Reference: from a checked record; paragraph addresses from the reference register
  • The page is not built when a passage is not found, or a step stands beside no passage

Euler’s figure and the model

C the centre of the earth, S the luminary, M a particle, P the foot of the perpendicular from M on CS; CP = x, PM = y.

The argument in nine parts

An emendation, tested

  • Opera omnia: 4xx + yy, “Correxit EJA”; first edition and manuscript: 4xx − yy
  • Against Euler’s exact component: 4xx − yy is of second order (1.8 · 10⁻⁴, 10⁻⁶, 10⁻⁸); 4xx + yy of first order only (2.0 · 10⁻², 10⁻³, 10⁻⁴)
  • Euler’s sign was right; his results, which use the first term, are untouched

Where the reconstruction does not follow Euler

  • §26: the resolution through QV and the similar triangles QVM, MPC is compared with its result, not rebuilt
  • §25: the first resolution, with the diagonal MO, is left out; nothing later cites it
  • §28: 54°45′ “circiter” is 54°44′ to the nearest minute
  • The notes say each of these at its passage

The exposition as a format

  • One file: passages, the steps beside them, notes
  • One element, <astra-exposition>: Latin · English, Overview · Steps · Full, Notes, Figure
  • The same file gives the page and the print
  • Any segment of any source of a Famulus collection can be taken through its argument in this way

Published by OpenScienceTechnology GmbH · Legal notice · Privacy